Professional readers

A transparent gateway to our evidence and editorial standards.

This section helps clinicians, researchers and other professionals quickly understand how our public-facing health content is sourced, reviewed and corrected.

Last updated: September 16, 2026

Scope

Our website is primarily a public educational resource. Unless a page explicitly states otherwise, content is not a clinical decision-support tool, guideline, continuing-education activity or substitute for primary literature.

Review transparency

When a qualified medical reviewer has reviewed an article, the reviewer and role should be identified. Pages without that label should not be assumed to have received clinician review.

Evidence traceability

We encourage professional readers to inspect cited guidance and primary literature, particularly for fast-moving, controversial or treatment-related topics.

Corrections

Professionals who identify a material error can send the page URL, the disputed statement and supporting evidence through our Contact page.

Good to know

Professional feedback is welcome, but publication on this website does not imply endorsement by a medical society, regulator or academic institution.